close
menu
close
menu
close
menu
close
menu
Walk into any histopathology department today and you'll see the same pattern: case volumes climbing at 4.5% annually, consultant posts unfilled, and turnaround time pressures that never let up. The default response has become asking existing staff to process more cases in less time, a strategy that's hitting its limits across the NHS.
When departments run at 97% capacity with skeleton staffing, any disruption creates backlogs that take weeks to clear. Staff work overtime just to keep pace with routine workload, let alone tackle accumulating cases. This isn't sustainable, and it's not necessary. Building real capacity means redesigning how pathology services operate, not just processing more cases through broken workflows.
Most pathology departments operate on priority systems where "urgent" cases get processed first, followed by "routine" work when time permits. Definitions of urgency shift constantly, creating a reactive cycle where staff never know what they'll be working on hour to hour.
The operational impact is measurable: slides prepared for routine reporting get repeatedly shuffled aside for new urgent cases. Technical staff waste time re-organizing work queues. Pathologists lose focus switching between case types. Administrative staff spend their day fielding queries about delayed cases rather than preventing delays.
A chronological approach, where operationally feasible, eliminates this churn. Cases move through the system in order of receipt, creating predictable workflows that staff can plan around. The difference shows immediately: fewer repeat handoffs, less time searching for cases, more focused diagnostic work.
The NHS has invested heavily in digital pathology scanners, but implementation often stops at hardware acquisition. Trusts purchase expensive scanning equipment then discover they need additional Medical Laboratory Assistants to manage the scanning queue, more administrative support to coordinate digital workflows, and technical staff to maintain integration with existing LIS systems.
Without this infrastructure, expensive scanners become bottlenecks rather than capacity solutions, creating new administrative overhead without delivering promised efficiency gains.
Not every task in a pathology lab requires the same level of training or experience. When consultant pathologists spend time triaging straightforward cases or Medical Laboratory Assistants handle administrative queries that coordinators could resolve, you're creating artificial capacity constraints.
By aligning responsibilities more closely with staff skillsets, and introducing specialist pathways for biomedical scientists and laboratory support teams, departments can create capacity while improving retention and morale. This isn't just about efficiency - it's about offering meaningful career progression, which is vital in a field where recruitment and retention are ongoing challenges.
Just as important is embedding a culture of wellbeing. Regular breaks, flexible scheduling, and access to peer support shouldn't be considered nice-to-haves. They are essential safeguards against fatigue, error, and staff turnover.
Most pathology information systems weren't designed to work together seamlessly. Reporting platforms operate separately from LIS systems. Digital pathology viewers don't integrate with case management tools. Administrative systems can't communicate with clinical platforms.
The result is operational friction that consumes significant staff time. Cases must be manually transferred between systems. Reports require duplicate data entry. Case status updates don't propagate across platforms, generating administrative queries that could be automatically resolved.
External partners like Diagnexia demonstrate what complete integration looks like in practice. Their systems connect seamlessly with trust LIS platforms, providing real-time case tracking and automatic status updates. Cases submitted electronically move through standardized workflows without manual intervention. Results integrate directly back into local systems without duplicate data entry.
This level of integration creates capacity by eliminating the administrative overhead that currently consumes significant staff resources.
The instinctive response to rising pressure is often to demand more: more overtime, more output, more hustle. But this model is not sustainable. Overworked teams make more mistakes, take more sick leave, and too often leave the profession entirely.
Rather than pushing for more, departments should focus on better: better workflows that reduce stress, better systems that eliminate duplication, better role design that maximizes skills, and better digital tools that support clinical work.
Building sustainable pathology services doesn't always require significant additional investment. What it does require is the courage to question old habits, embrace modern tools, and prioritize staff health alongside service metrics.
At Diagnexia, we believe building capacity should never come at the cost of staff wellbeing. Our virtual pathology services combine flexible digital platforms, LIS integration, and subspecialist expertise with a commitment to supporting sustainable teams.
If your department is ready to move from firefighting to future-proofing, speak to our team today about building resilience without burnout.
Walk into any histopathology department today and you'll see the same pattern: case volumes climbing at 4.5% annually, consultant posts unfilled, and turnaround time pressures that never let up. The default response has become asking existing staff to process more cases in less time, a strategy that's hitting its limits across the NHS.
When departments run at 97% capacity with skeleton staffing, any disruption creates backlogs that take weeks to clear. Staff work overtime just to keep pace with routine workload, let alone tackle accumulating cases. This isn't sustainable, and it's not necessary. Building real capacity means redesigning how pathology services operate, not just processing more cases through broken workflows.
Most pathology departments operate on priority systems where "urgent" cases get processed first, followed by "routine" work when time permits. Definitions of urgency shift constantly, creating a reactive cycle where staff never know what they'll be working on hour to hour.
The operational impact is measurable: slides prepared for routine reporting get repeatedly shuffled aside for new urgent cases. Technical staff waste time re-organizing work queues. Pathologists lose focus switching between case types. Administrative staff spend their day fielding queries about delayed cases rather than preventing delays.
A chronological approach, where operationally feasible, eliminates this churn. Cases move through the system in order of receipt, creating predictable workflows that staff can plan around. The difference shows immediately: fewer repeat handoffs, less time searching for cases, more focused diagnostic work.
The NHS has invested heavily in digital pathology scanners, but implementation often stops at hardware acquisition. Trusts purchase expensive scanning equipment then discover they need additional Medical Laboratory Assistants to manage the scanning queue, more administrative support to coordinate digital workflows, and technical staff to maintain integration with existing LIS systems.
Without this infrastructure, expensive scanners become bottlenecks rather than capacity solutions, creating new administrative overhead without delivering promised efficiency gains.
Not every task in a pathology lab requires the same level of training or experience. When consultant pathologists spend time triaging straightforward cases or Medical Laboratory Assistants handle administrative queries that coordinators could resolve, you're creating artificial capacity constraints.
By aligning responsibilities more closely with staff skillsets, and introducing specialist pathways for biomedical scientists and laboratory support teams, departments can create capacity while improving retention and morale. This isn't just about efficiency - it's about offering meaningful career progression, which is vital in a field where recruitment and retention are ongoing challenges.
Just as important is embedding a culture of wellbeing. Regular breaks, flexible scheduling, and access to peer support shouldn't be considered nice-to-haves. They are essential safeguards against fatigue, error, and staff turnover.
Most pathology information systems weren't designed to work together seamlessly. Reporting platforms operate separately from LIS systems. Digital pathology viewers don't integrate with case management tools. Administrative systems can't communicate with clinical platforms.
The result is operational friction that consumes significant staff time. Cases must be manually transferred between systems. Reports require duplicate data entry. Case status updates don't propagate across platforms, generating administrative queries that could be automatically resolved.
External partners like Diagnexia demonstrate what complete integration looks like in practice. Their systems connect seamlessly with trust LIS platforms, providing real-time case tracking and automatic status updates. Cases submitted electronically move through standardized workflows without manual intervention. Results integrate directly back into local systems without duplicate data entry.
This level of integration creates capacity by eliminating the administrative overhead that currently consumes significant staff resources.
The instinctive response to rising pressure is often to demand more: more overtime, more output, more hustle. But this model is not sustainable. Overworked teams make more mistakes, take more sick leave, and too often leave the profession entirely.
Rather than pushing for more, departments should focus on better: better workflows that reduce stress, better systems that eliminate duplication, better role design that maximizes skills, and better digital tools that support clinical work.
Building sustainable pathology services doesn't always require significant additional investment. What it does require is the courage to question old habits, embrace modern tools, and prioritize staff health alongside service metrics.
At Diagnexia, we believe building capacity should never come at the cost of staff wellbeing. Our virtual pathology services combine flexible digital platforms, LIS integration, and subspecialist expertise with a commitment to supporting sustainable teams.
If your department is ready to move from firefighting to future-proofing, speak to our team today about building resilience without burnout.
